Bisimilarity is not Borel

We prove that the relation of bisimilarity between countable labelled transition systems is $\Sigma_1^1$-complete (hence not Borel), by reducing the set of non-wellorders over the natural numbers continuously to it. This has an impact on the theory of probabilistic and nondeterministic processes over uncountable spaces, since logical characterizations of bisimilarity (as, for instance, those based on the unique structure theorem for analytic spaces) require a countable logic whose formulas have measurable semantics. Our reduction shows that such a logic does not exist in the case of image-infinite processes.Comment: 20 pages, 1 figure; proof of Sigma_1^1 completeness added with extended comments. I acknowledge careful reading by the referees. Major changes in Introduction, Conclusion, and motivation for NLMP. Proof for Lemma 22 added, simpler proofs for Lemma 17 and Theorem 30. Added references. Part of this work was presented at Dagstuhl Seminar 12411 on Coalgebraic Logic

Unprovability of the Logical Characterization of Bisimulation

We quickly review labelled Markov processes (LMP) and provide a counterexample showing that in general measurable spaces, event bisimilarity and state bisimilarity differ in LMP. This shows that the logic in Desharnais [*] does not characterize state bisimulation in non-analytic measurable spaces. Furthermore we show that, under current foundations of Mathematics, such logical characterization is unprovable for spaces that are projections of a coanalytic set. Underlying this construction there is a proof that stationary Markov processes over general measurable spaces do not have semi-pullbacks. ([*] J. Desharnais, Labelled Markov Processes. School of Computer Science. McGill University, Montr\'eal (1999))Comment: Extended introduction and comments; extra section on semi-pullbacks; 11 pages Some background details added; extra example on the non-locality of state bisimilarity; 14 page

The Lattice of Congruences of a Finite Line Frame

Let $\mathbf{F}=\left\langle F,R\right\rangle$ be a finite Kripke frame. A congruence of $\mathbf{F}$ is a bisimulation of $\mathbf{F}$ that is also an equivalence relation on F. The set of all congruences of $\mathbf{F}$ is a lattice under the inclusion ordering. In this article we investigate this lattice in the case that $\mathbf{F}$ is a finite line frame. We give concrete descriptions of the join and meet of two congruences with a nontrivial upper bound. Through these descriptions we show that for every nontrivial congruence $\rho$, the interval $[\mathrm{Id_{F},\rho]}$ embeds into the lattice of divisors of a suitable positive integer. We also prove that any two congruences with a nontrivial upper bound permute.Comment: 31 pages, 11 figures. Expanded intro, conclusions rewritten. New, less geometrical, proofs of Lemma 19 and (former) Lemma 3

Varieties with Definable Factor Congruences

We study direct product representations of algebras in varieties. We collect several conditions expressing that these representations are "definable" in a first-order-logic sense, among them the concept of Definable Factor Congruences (DFC). The main results are that DFC is a Mal'cev property and that it is equivalent to all other conditions formulated; in particular we prove that V has DFC if and only if V has 0&1 and Boolean Factor Congruences. We also obtain an explicit first order definition of the kernel of the canonical projections via the terms associated to the Mal'cev condition for DFC, in such a manner it is preserved by taking direct products and direct factors. The main tool is the use of "central elements," which are a generalization of both central idempotent elements in rings with identity and neutral complemented elements in a bounded lattice